AI for DNA Engineering & DNA Data Storage: Design, Safety, and Archival Promise

Abstract
AI techniques are reshaping DNA engineering — from CRISPR guide design and off-target prediction to models that propose novel sequences — and are supporting a renewed drive to use DNA as ultra-dense archival storage. This article summarizes state-of-the-art AI methods for DNA design and data storage, reviews safety/interpretability concerns, and outlines near-term research priorities.

AI in DNA engineering (CRISPR guide design & off-target prediction)

AI-driven sequence models and deep learning classifiers have improved prediction of CRISPR guide efficacy and off-target risks. Multiple recent deep-learning tools (e.g., DeepCRISPR and newer interpretable models) demonstrate higher predictive accuracy than early score-based heuristics; comprehensive reviews compare models and emphasize the need for standardized datasets and interpretability. Applying interpretable architectures helps flag risky off-target profiles prior to bench work.

Practical note: while prediction accuracy has improved, any AI-predicted guides must be validated experimentally — computational prediction is a risk-reduction step, not a replacement for wet-lab validation.

AI in DNA sequence generation and repair outcome prediction

Generative models (sequence transformers and RNNs) are being used to propose biologically plausible sequences for promoters, guides, or minimal functional elements. Other models predict repair outcomes after double-strand breaks (DSBs), assisting experimental planning.

DNA as archival storage — role for AI

Storing digital data in synthetic DNA requires encoding binary data into nucleotide sequences that preserve biochemical stability and minimize synthesis/sequencing errors. AI/ML helps in:

• Optimized encodings to avoid problematic motifs (homopolymers, high/low GC stretches).
• Error-correcting code design and adaptive decoding that compensates for synthesis/sequencing error profiles.
• Automated, closed-loop systems demonstrated by collaborations between Microsoft and University of Washington for end-to-end automated synthesis & retrieval — a major step toward practical DNA data storage.

Safety, ethics & governance

• Dual-use risk: sequence generation models could theoretically be misused; responsible disclosure, access controls, and model governance are essential.
• Data privacy: genomic data used for training must be handled under appropriate consent and governance frameworks.
• Robust validation and community benchmarks are critical before clinical or industrial deployment.

Research priorities

1. Benchmark datasets and open leaderboards for CRISPR and sequence-design tasks.
2. Interpretable models that provide mechanistic insights, not only predictions.
3. Integrated ML–wet-lab pipelines with active learning loops to reduce lab effort and accelerate robust dataset creation.
4. Standards for DNA data storage including ML-enhanced error correction and long-term stability studies.

Recommended reading (key sources)

• Sherkatghanad Z. et al., Review: CRISPR on/off-target prediction models. Briefings in Bioinformatics (2023).
• Microsoft & UW automated DNA data storage demo (press/technical notes, 2019).
• Recent interpretable deep-learning off-target model: CRISPR-DIPOFF (2024, PMC).

---

Source list

1. Poplin R. A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks (DeepVariant). Nature Biotechnology (2018).
2. DeepVariant project (GitHub).
3. Microsoft + UW — first fully automated DNA data storage demo (UW News / Microsoft Research).
4. Sherkatghanad Z. et al., CRISPR/Cas9 off-target prediction review, Briefings in Bioinformatics (2023).
5. CRISPR-DIPOFF (interpretable deep-learning off-target prediction), PMC (2024).
6. Lee DH et al., Advances in AI models and genomics (MDPI, 2025).
7. DNA data storage reviews and outlooks (ScienceDirect reviews).